EVE Search - New EVE Online forums temporarily disabled

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

New EVE Online forums temporarily disabled

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 36 post(s)
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.10 00:15:00 - [1] Hey wait, wheres Sreeg, the mouthpiece? Why isnt he here reassuring us everything's OK etc etc etc
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.10 00:25:00 - [2] Edited by: Sullen Skoung on 10/04/2011 00:26:39 Originally by: CCP Sreegs Originally by: Sullen Skoung Hey wait, wheres Sreeg, the mouthpiece? Why isnt he here reassuring us everything's OK etc etc etc I believe what I did was tell you I'd have the results of an investigation (now 2!) in a blog. That hasn't changed so I hope that makes you feel OK. lol I invoked his name... hi! Its a nice excuse, theres a security issue, ppl try to take him to task, he goes "whoa whoa, Im REACTIVE not PREVENTATIVE"
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.10 00:38:00 - [3] Originally by: Miilla Originally by: Better Than You This is called Karma CCP. You did an unnecessary nerf to the real players who were busting their ass out in null sec by removing their ability to actually make any decent ISK. I strongly suggest you reverse that anomaly change and maybe the programing gods will smile on you once more. CCP Karma? When did he start working there? When does he publish a blog? Soon(tm)
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.10 00:52:00 - [4] Originally by: Akita T Security holes aside, how about an assurance that user feedback will be actually USED next time you ask us to test the forums ? Or what about making the new forums not just barely functional and somewhat secure, but actually a clear improvement over the current ones in every single way ? Honestly I doubt any of the CCP forum types actually CAN make any of those requests true, even if they say they can.
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.10 01:23:00 - [5] Originally by: Grey Stormshadow Yep... duke nukem forever took forever to finish, but people were still waiting for it as it was going to be epic :) Ever hear of a company called Gearbox? They published Borderlands... and took over Duke Nukem. http://www.dukenukemforever.com/full/us/ Kind of a fail comparison as it IS gonna be epic lol
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.10 01:40:00 - [6] hand up ok ok you caught me trollin
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.10 01:52:00 - [7] Ah, I understand!! The forum fail was on purpose, to distract ppl from the botting cancer growing in the game.
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.10 04:24:00 - [8] Originally by: Jonathan Malcom Originally by: Calathea Sata CCP broke my heart Holy **ing dog . Quit the game already and stop **ting up my forums with your intolerable drivel. you first :)
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.10 16:32:00 - [9] Originally by: CCP Navigator That is right. Your login and password would not have been compromised. It should also be noted though that it is just good practice to change your passwords regularly lol this reads "there was no danger, but you probably should anyways" to me
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.10 16:35:00 - [10] Originally by: CCP Sreegs I'm sure a lot of people work for a lot of good companies. What I was stating was that if anyone has an actual evidence of the malfeasance that was suggested they're welcome to email it to me. love the defense by way of "prove we got the emails" when theres no way you actually can do that short of working at CCP.

Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.10 16:40:00 - [11] Originally by: Grimpak in all honesty the chance was still slim. not impossible but the likelihood of it happening was small since that, altho there was some time wasted, they acted within a couple of hours. granted it's still a couple of hours and any semi-competent scripter can code anything in that time, but as far as one can see, nothing happened yet. also, as far as one knows, the major security breach was only code related. the cookie derp, as stated, didn't go beyond forums. it was still a very serious security breach however, and precautions are still welcome. Is it scary to anyone that here, slim chance is OK in a situation where "no chance" SHOULD be whats acceptable?
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.10 17:00:00 - [12] Originally by: CCP Sreegs Originally by: Sullen Skoung Originally by: CCP Sreegs I'm sure a lot of people work for a lot of good companies. What I was stating was that if anyone has an actual evidence of the malfeasance that was suggested they're welcome to email it to me. love the defense by way of "prove we got the emails" when theres no way you actually can do that short of working at CCP. I said if you have evidence send it to me. I never said prove we got them. If you're going to try to reword a post you should probably not do so with the complete text of the statement quoted. Still a crap defense man, we CANT get the emails from your site so theres no way TO prove that we sent them. Its a stupid defense when all you have to do is get whoever browses ccp@security email FOR those emails, assuming that isnt you. Unless of course you cant send them an email or talk to them or something. Which would be a ****ty way to run a company tbh
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.10 17:12:00 - [13] Originally by: CCP Sreegs Quote: Still a crap defense man, we CANT get the emails from your site so theres no way TO prove that we sent them. Its a stupid defense when all you have to do is get whoever browses ccp@security email FOR those emails, assuming that isnt you. Unless of course you cant send them an email or talk to them or something. Which would be a ****ty way to run a company tbh What? I have no idea what you're trying to say. you are saying WE need to provide proof of sending emails to ccp@security IM saying we cant provide this proof being that we cant get into ccp@security to get copies of those emails sent. YOU who work at CCP, supposedly AS security, should either be able to access that email account or email the guy that can and can see if those emails do in fact exist.
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.10 17:17:00 - [14] Originally by: CCP Sreegs I never said I didn't have those mails.... I said that if you have any evidence that someone within the company is doing something wrong as was intimated by the original post, then that was the address to send it to... that was the entirety of what I was trying to state. I don't know how that got twisted into this. cause we work for CCP Internal affairs and can provide this proof? Again, using the defence of "prove it to me" when we dont have access to internal CCP documents isnt a defense
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.10 17:19:00 - [15] Edited by: Sullen Skoung on 10/04/2011 17:21:43 Originally by: Hel O'Ween And I remind you that Cat reported the issue first and then - when his warning got ignored - demonstrated it for all to see. This was the time CCP finally got the message and pulled the plug. I think this is the part that Sreegs is trying to get us to prove Originally by: Gnulpie Man, jeez, give them folks at CCP some time to investigate what exactly happend, where the vulnerabilities are, what communication channels failed (if they failed) etc. This takes time and such things can't be properly done in few hours! You guys want thorough investigation and at the same time you want results, blogs and whatnot already yesterday. That's not working! If there is still no public reply in a few days, THEN is the time to make a huge uproar, but for now let them do their work. Ranting, venting anger and frustration is good and fine, but after that, let it go and calm down. no offense, but look at the player base youre talking to... the phrase "falling on deaf ears" comes to mind
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.10 17:23:00 - [16] Edited by: Sullen Skoung on 10/04/2011 17:23:43 Originally by: Jon Taggart Originally by: Sullen Skoung Originally by: Hel O'Ween And I remind you that Cat reported the issue first and then - when his warning got ignored - demonstrated it for all to see. This was the time CCP finally got the message and pulled the plug. I think this is the part that Sreegs is trying to get us to prove Will have to wait until the forums are back up. The link to the test forums provided here does not work. well the reported part was what I was talking about There are pics showing the demonstrated part already lol
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.10 17:35:00 - [17] Originally by: CCP Sreegs Originally by: Sullen Skoung Originally by: CCP Sreegs I'm sure a lot of people work for a lot of good companies. What I was stating was that if anyone has an actual evidence of the malfeasance that was suggested they're welcome to email it to me. love the defense by way of "prove we got the emails" when theres no way you actually can do that short of working at CCP. I said if you have evidence send it to me. I never said prove we got them. If you're going to try to reword a post you should probably not do so with the complete text of the statement quoted. why do we need to send you evidence? Originally by: CCP Sreegs Nobody has to prove anything about anyone's actions on the forums I have full logs of everything.
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.10 17:39:00 - [18] Originally by: Akita T Originally by: Sullen Skoung why do we need to send you evidence? Because, apparently, the QA team is not. you gotta read all the quotes lol
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.10 17:47:00 - [19] Edited by: Sullen Skoung on 10/04/2011 17:47:03 no, I was saying that Sreegs said to prove such we needed to send evidenve then tells us we dont need to send it cause he has all the logs
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.10 23:17:00 - [20] I found something more fail than CCP's fiasco ---------------------------------------- CCP Forum fail ALMOST as much fail as this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnZb5wi_jsU

Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.10 23:33:00 - [21] Originally by: Calathea Sata Originally by: Sullen Skoung I found something more fail than CCP's fiasco what is it http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnZb5wi_jsU ---------------------------------------- CCP Forum fail ALMOST as much fail as this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnZb5wi_jsU
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.10 23:40:00 - [22] Edited by: Sullen Skoung on 10/04/2011 23:40:15 Yeah I fail in that I forgot to put it in URL Edit: fixt ---------------------------------------- CCP Forum fail ALMOST as much fail as this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnZb5wi_jsU
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.11 17:03:00 - [23] Originally by: Grimpak Originally by: Akita T Originally by: Grimpak wait, are you telling me that this the exact same ****up as on boot.ini but in a different place? It would appear so, at least as far as signatures are concerned... wtf, didn't they fired that guy? no, they did with him the same as they did with T20; xferred him to a new department... Web design would be my guess ---------------------------------------- CCP Forum fail ALMOST as much fail as this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnZb5wi_jsU
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.11 17:07:00 - [24] Originally by: Yuki Kulotsuki Originally by: Elyssa MacLeod hey Yuki Kulotsuki, whats the alliance? Oh no. I'm not falling for that. You're trying to get me to do something I'm not supposed to and end up banned. ... Maybe it's ok to use the ticker... C0M you can get BANNED for saying an alliance's NAME?? WOW these guys are ban happy now arent they? What rule does that violate on the forums TOS or w/e again? Oh yeah, where is that blog Sreegs was writing? I looked in the info area and I dont see it; I could be blind though ---------------------------------------- CCP Forum fail ALMOST as much fail as this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnZb5wi_jsU
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.11 17:53:00 - [25] is Sreegs' blog out yet? ---------------------------------------- Whats the forum TOS violation for saying an alliance's name?
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.11 17:58:00 - [26] Edited by: Sullen Skoung on 11/04/2011 18:00:36 Edited by: Sullen Skoung on 11/04/2011 18:00:17 Edited by: Sullen Skoung on 11/04/2011 17:59:10 Originally by: Miilla Originally by: Yuki Kulotsuki Originally by: NinjaSpud stuff The errors in the forums was the kind of thing that should never make it past code review. There were feedback threads on the test set up that were ignored and the forums were pushed live. When you're adapting software that works and you make it unstable that's a problem. It is even more of a problem when people EXPLOIT the defects for their own gain. woo, beat that dead horse Miilla, I think it twitched, beat it again. Originally by: Kengutsi Akira Originally by: Marcus Fey Lol Miilla Clearly you didnt bother to read the SHC thread while it was up "exploited account" customer didn't seem that bothered to me You have to understand, miilla cant hear us from the white knight standpoint. "Its the PRINCIPLE. It doesnt MATTER if they cared or not." Originally by: Miilla It is even more of a problem when people EXPLOIT the defects for their own gain. see? ---------------------------------------- Whats the forum TOS violation for saying an alliance's name?
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.11 18:48:00 - [27] Anyone noticing, sigs aside, theres almost no forum moderation going on right now? Wonder if it cause theyre just gonna freeze this once they un**** the new forums? ---------------------------------------- Whats the forum TOS violation for saying an alliance's name?
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.11 18:53:00 - [28] Originally by: El'Niaga Originally by: Sullen Skoung Anyone noticing, sigs aside, theres almost no forum moderation going on right now? Wonder if it cause theyre just gonna freeze this once they un**** the new forums? Actually that's one of the smart things they're doing right now. One thing in the SOE NGE/SWG fiasco was the over moderation of everything by SOE which continued to fan the flames. By allowing some voice they ease the pressure. then again they were doing just that before this fiasco, over the Botting fiasco (which everyone seems to have forgotten) locking all threads and pointing to the One Botting Thread ---------------------------------------- Whats the forum TOS violation for saying an alliance's name?
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.11 19:05:00 - [29] Originally by: Demoness Lolth To all in this thread. Want some cheese with your ****ing Whine ? Shouldnt you have black skin and white hair? ---------------------------------------- Whats the forum TOS violation for saying an alliance's name?
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.11 20:06:00 - [30] Originally by: phintais I can't find anyone online that likes the new forums. Well noone that REALLY likes it and isnt just trolling for luls

Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.11 20:45:00 - [31] Originally by: Diomedes Calypso [ I think this is true .... also the very idea that a company has always allowed posts critical to their company to exist on their forums is something that won me over to the game from day 1 This is a major statement of theirs that attacted me to the game. lol what company/game is this? I know ppl that have gotten band for saying certain names or misspelling certain alliance's names lol Quote: a company has always allowed posts critical to their company to exist on their forums lol thats just so funny I had to quote it twice
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.11 21:04:00 - [32] Originally by: dexington Originally by: phintais I can't find anyone online that likes the new forums. I liked the new forums. like I said, that arent trolling lol
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.11 21:44:00 - [33] Originally by: Diomedes Calypso Everything is relative... of course they will have some moderation excesses now and then but compared to other games they allow an incredible amount of dialogue lol rose colored glasses You used to get BANNED for calling BoB BoD No joke
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.11 22:03:00 - [34] Originally by: Hakaru Ishiwara Now if only CCP and their management team would stop repeating the same damn software development mistakes made time and time again over the years. Or the same bull**** excuses over an over
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.11 22:09:00 - [35] Originally by: Akita T Originally by: Aeronwen Carys Any idea when the Monday Devblog is coming out? Monday, April 18 ? He DID say monday, not WHAT monday
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.11 23:14:00 - [36] Originally by: CCP Sreegs Your understanding is pretty correct. Doesnt that usually qualify as the part where you say you cant tell us cause it might get you in trouble, being that the guy you are responding to seems to be saying that this was a giant ****up that never should have happened and youre agreeing? Or could someone layman's terms it? I dont do code lol
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.12 03:41:00 - [37] arrrg they killed the post I wanted to sig lol -------- Dammit, they killed the post where Sreegs says personal attacks are against the rules. I wanted to lol at him for that
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.13 23:30:00 - [38] You know, if they disabled the 2 min wait and added a like button here, they could stuff the new ones -------- Dammit, they killed the post where Sreegs says personal attacks are against the rules. I wanted to lol at him for that
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.15 19:47:00 - [39] lol @ unstickying the thread "lets make this disappear..." -------- Dammit, they killed the post where Sreegs says personal attacks are against the rules. I wanted to lol at him for that
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.04.18 12:49:00 - [40] wonder what page this was on when I bumped it? -------- Dammit, they killed the post where Sreegs says personal attacks are against the rules. I wanted to lol at him for that

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.